IRMO CRIME

[Anonymous]

BOY IRMO HAS GONE DOWN HILL AS OF LATE.
BOTH BI-LOW'S ROBBED AS WELL AS ZIPPY MARTS.

MAYBE IT'S TIME FOR A NEW MAYOR.

GOT TO LOVE ALL THEM SECTION 8'S

[Anonymous]

The New Friarsgate is the biggest problem for Irmo. Full of nothing but a bunch of juvenile thugs roaming all hours of the night breaking into things, vandalizing property, dealing drugs and trying to find areas in town for their gangs to hang out..
I try to keep tabs on things by going to local home association meetings. An officer talked about how bad the problems are and showed us pictures of seized rugs and weapons. Heck we were even told about a huge gang fight off of South Roayl Twr. As I understand, Irmo had to call every Richland and Lexington Deputy they could get for back up...which brings up another idea.
How can Irmo people keep re-electing a looser like Mayor Gibbons ? Irmo's got more money than they know what to do with and he thinks he's spending his own money...the cheap joker ! Anti-police Mayor Gibbons and Town Administrator Hanson spend hundreds of thousands on damn trees and a couple of earthmovers for public works and almost a million on sidewalks...but wont give the police what they need in equipment, pay and personnel.
Yeah, the police dept. will finally get a new building after the mayor held it up for two stinking years. I bet he wanted to die when he had to smile on the Irmo News front page when they broke ground.

[Anonymous]

Are you kidding me?!? No officer at Irmo is going to commit a "battery" against anybody. That is THE MOST POLITICALLY CORRECT department I know of. Besides, its all on video tape...do you think he is going to be that stupid? Besides..a terry frisk is an outer pat down for WEAPONS! They are not meant to be like a massage. What were you doing to give him any indication that you may have weapons?

[Anonymous]

Yeah great job Paul, before you start spittin out court cases you might want to read them a little more closely...He was obviously looking for weapons that you might have been concealing...You just happen to fit a description of someone they were looking for... i can tell you know nothing about law enforcement or you would know he was doing his job to keep our community safe you little prick... Why dont you trying doing his job one time, then you would appreciate your pitiful life with all the crap that people like you put these officers through...Your just a stuck up citizen who thinks that your above the law...You complain about everything until you need their help! Half an hour out of your life is a small price to pay to keep everyone else safe...If you dont like the great job that their doing then you need to find somewhere else to live! Stop your whinning and get on with your life... :binkybab:

[Anonymous]

Maybe the Irmo Police should spend some money on teaching their officers how to conduct a proper road side detention. I know that patrolman Courtney Dennis could sure benefit from such instruction. He stopped me on friday, March 18 at around 1:05 p.m. near the Irmo Bi-Lo and committed a battery against me disguised as a legitimate "Terry frisk", i.e. Terry v. Ohio(1968). I have filed a complaint against him with the Irmo Police Department.

Police officers no doubt have a tough job, but they shouldn't just get to put their hands on who they want when they want because they feel it is their entitlement.

Paul Seay

pseay@mail.com


How were you battered?
and how was it disguised as a terry frisk?

[Anonymous]

Perhaps it is ya'll who need to read up on some cases before telling me that I am wrong, and that this patrolman was in the right. Among those cases are Terry v. Ohio(1968), and Sibron v. New York(1968). Here in South Carolina, there are numerous cases in recent years where evidence was ruled inadmissible by our Court of Appeals and Supreme Court due to improper Terry searches.

In regards to my case, I did some research after this stop took place. Citing Terry v. Ohio, the S.C. Court of Appeals in State v. Burton(decision #3466) stated "Once a basis for a lawful investigatory stop exists, a law enforcement officer may protect himself during the stop by conducting a search or frisk for weapons if he has reason to believe that the suspect is "armed and dangerous". The decision goes on in its holding to state that "In determing whether a stopped individual is armed and dangerous, the officer need not be absolutely certain that the individual is armed; the issue is whether a reasonably prudent man in the circumstances would be warranted in the belief that his safety or that of others was in danger."


S.C. Court of Appeals decision (#3085), State v. Blassingame, the court reasoned that a Terry frisk was reasonable due to the fact that the stopped individual(Blassingame) was dishonest about where he was coming from. In my case, the patrolman received truthful responses from me, could see from my I.D. card that I lived only a mile away, and could not claim that he saw any bulge that appeared to be a weapon. Absent a reason to put their hands on an individual, even a police officer is guilty in this state of the crime of simple battery if they put their hands on someone without justification.

Ya'll can defend this patrolman all you want, but the fact remains that he committed the crime of simple battery against me.

[Anonymous]

quote Ya'll can defend this patrolman all you want, but the fact remains that he committed the crime of simple battery against me.[/quote]

Apparently we are not the only ones who are defending him. The investigation was CLOSED! All he was doing was trying to protect the citizens of Irmo. I swear, you people never cease to amaze me. If your house gets robbed.."WHERE ARE THE POLICE..." oh, but when they do thier jobs..."THEY ARE HARRASING ME" you are such a LOOSER! I think you need to quit reading the statutes and try and figure out how you would apply it to a REAL LIFE SITUATION. Its easy to sit on the side lines and arm-chair-quarterback every situation. HAVE YOU EVER PUT TERRY v. OHIO TO THE TEST IN A REAL LIFE SITUATION??? didnt think so, because if you did you wouldnt be bichin' like a momma's boy.

If you dont like it...MOVE OUT OF IRMO! They have some of the best officers in the state...and a no good, low life like you, doesnt deserve that protection.

[Anonymous]

He thought you were armed and dangerous because you matched the description of someone who had stolen 3 guns! Get over it you idiot! Ever heard of "GOOD FAITH" I think you need to take those books and read some more!

[Anonymous]

Are you kidding me?!? No officer at Irmo is going to commit a "battery" against anybody. That is THE MOST POLITICALLY CORRECT department I know of. Besides, its all on video tape...do you think he is going to be that stupid? Besides..a terry frisk is an outer pat down for WEAPONS! They are not meant to be like a massage. What were you doing to give him any indication that you may have weapons?

[Anonymous]

You matched a description, you got stopped, you got patted down, you got let go, case closed... STOP WHINNING PANSY!!!

[Anonymous]

Whoever titled their post with "Your Stupid" really, really needs to rethink what he said/says. Simple grammar mistakes like this make me laugh at people like you.

Hey Paul, if you feel you were a victim of battery I say kudos to you for filing a complaint. If for any reason anyone feels violated they should file a police report or in your case a comlaint. Good job of being a citizen that is informed.

As far as the ones in here posting "If you dont like it leave" I laugh at you and point as I walk away!

[Anonymous]

Whoever titled their post with "Your Stupid" really, really needs to rethink what he said/says. Simple grammar mistakes like this make me laugh at people like you.

Hey Paul, if you feel you were a victim of battery I say kudos to you for filing a complaint. If for any reason anyone feels violated they should file a police report or in your case a comlaint. Good job of being a citizen that is informed.

As far as the ones in here posting "If you dont like it leave" I laugh at you and point as I walk away!


Well, you know, its these "GAY" (and I do emphasize GAY) complaints that tie up the investigator's time when they could be investigating more important things like...um..I dont know...maybe CHILD ABUSE, or a HOMICIDE..god forbid Irmo ever has one. Yeah, lets go tattle on the officer for doing his job...boo hoo... I was on my way to the golf course when Mr. Bad Cop pulled me over and made me get out. And then, he searched me...the nerve! DUDE...GROW A SET..get off of your mamma's boob and GROW UP! You got searched no big deal. And if you dont like it, you should move to a LAWLESS country like Afghanistan, where you NEVER have to worry about any officer violating your rights...they would simply shoot you first! In this case...that might be called for!

[Anonymous]

Paul, Paul, Paul. What can I say about your posts that hasn't already been said of the great Harlequin Romance Novels? You are very articulate and imaginative. The law is a complex and changing entity and it will take more than quoting aged case law to fool anyone into thinking you understand it. Paul, you are no expert, Officer Dennis is a professional. He is educated, graduated the Police Academy and participates in yearly training to get ACCURATE updates of the laws you have attempted to research. Officer Dennis should be applauded for his tenacity and work ethic in the face of the educated ignorant, such as yourself. Thankfully, you people are a minority.

Sit down before you strain something.

[Anonymous]

Well, yeah AFTER he was arrested. Who knows, maybe he could have grown a beard. GET OVER IT! Like I said in my earlier post..ITS EASY TO ARM CHAIR QUARTERBACK when YOUR NOT the one actually out there on the streets working. Get over it, obviously there was nothing to your complaint because the department has closed the investigation and Courtney has been CLEARED! Dont you think if it was a "REAL" battery the department would have stepped in and investigated the officer?!? OH WAIT A MINUTE, I FORGOT..YOUR NOT THE POLICE!!!!! Don't forget..everything was on VIDEO! Dont come on here and down the man because he was doing his job! Hey, at least he wasnt sitting at the Krispy Kreme, but then again, if he was, you would be on here bitchin about that! You people are never satisfied! All I have to say is....
GO COURTNEY! KEEP IRMO SAFE!!!!!
:prayer: :werd:

[Anonymous]

Yeah PAUL...you might want to keep your mouth shut...from what I hear, your not so perfect and there are LOTS of things about you that we could go on and on about.

[Anonymous]

Paul, ever gone to work and been shot at? Ever gone to work and found out that your friend died after a close range shot to the chest and then been asked to go work his beat?

I have. You were checked for weapons because the officer wanted to enusre his safety. You were not battered.

You're simply angry because you were stopped. You'd be just as angry if a criminal was not stopped and then broke into your house.

156 police officers died last year while on duty. Think about it.

[Anonymous]

Perhaps it is ya'll who need to read up on some cases before telling me that I am wrong, and that this patrolman was in the right. Among those cases are Terry v. Ohio(1968), and Sibron v. New York(1968). Here in South Carolina, there are numerous cases in recent years where evidence was ruled inadmissible by our Court of Appeals and Supreme Court due to improper Terry searches.

In regards to my case, I did some research after this stop took place. Citing Terry v. Ohio, the S.C. Court of Appeals in State v. Burton(decision #3466) stated "Once a basis for a lawful investigatory stop exists, a law enforcement officer may protect himself during the stop by conducting a search or frisk for weapons if he has reason to believe that the suspect is "armed and dangerous". The decision goes on in its holding to state that "In determing whether a stopped individual is armed and dangerous, the officer need not be absolutely certain that the individual is armed; the issue is whether a reasonably prudent man in the circumstances would be warranted in the belief that his safety or that of others was in danger."


S.C. Court of Appeals decision (#3085), State v. Blassingame, the court reasoned that a Terry frisk was reasonable due to the fact that the stopped individual(Blassingame) was dishonest about where he was coming from. In my case, the patrolman received truthful responses from me, could see from my I.D. card that I lived only a mile away, and could not claim that he saw any bulge that appeared to be a weapon. Absent a reason to put their hands on an individual, even a police officer is guilty in this state of the crime of simple battery if they put their hands on someone without justification.

Ya'll can defend this patrolman all you want, but the fact remains that he committed the crime of simple battery against me.

QUIT WHINNING YOU LITTLE FAG! :violin:

[Anonymous]

Paul, ever gone to work and been shot at? Ever gone to work and found out that your friend died after a close range shot to the chest and then been asked to go work his beat?

I have. You were checked for weapons because the officer wanted to enusre his safety. You were not battered.

You're simply angry because you were stopped. You'd be just as angry if a criminal was not stopped and then broke into your house.

156 police officers died last year while on duty. Think about it.

Paul doesn't have time to think, he is too busy with his camcorder.

[Anonymous]

Terry v. Ohio relates to the admissability of evidence found during a pat down search if such evidence is introduced during a criminal trial. You were released without being charged so you have no claim under the Terry ruling.

When police are not proactive we accuse them of not doing thier job. When police are proactive, we accuse them of harrassing us. Time to make up our minds, don't you think?

[LWR VENTURES]

Mr. Seay? Wondered where you got off to? LOL!

[Anonymous]

Mr. Seay? Wondered where you got off to? LOL!

I think that all depends on what time the kiddies get off the bus! What a perv.

[Unregistered]

We will see who is laughing when a lawsuit is filed. My investigation has found that Patrolman Courtney Dennis has a criminal record, and that the reason the Irmo Police acted so overzealously on March 18 was because the alleged victim is a former police officer, so naturally the brotherhood of brainless morons mentality kicked in and they violated Mr. Seay's rights. The defendant in this case, Jonathan Randell Litch, is due in court on July 28, perhaps to plead guilty.

As an individual who is rooting for Mr. Seay in this one, I can't wait until this case of State v. Litch is complete so that Mr. Seay can then file a Motion to Produce documents so he can prove and win his civil case against the Irmo Police.

For those of you who think that Terry v. Ohio can't be applied to a civil case here in S.C., I suggest ya'll hit the books and read the 1984 decision handed down by the S.C. Supreme Court in the case of Gathers v. Harris Teeter Supermarkets. In that case, the plaintiff Gathers was briefly detained by a North Charleston police officer on suspicion of shoplifting, and she was frisked even though the jury found there was no probable cause to detain the plaintiff. Since the police officer was an agent for the supermarket chain, the plaintiff Gathers won at trial. The facts in this case are very similar to the one's in Mr. Seay's case, and I have no doubt that he can prevail in any lawsuit against the town of Irmo pursuant to the South Carolina Torts Claims Act.

Mr. Seay, I see you e-mail address on a previous post, and I'll be contacting you shortly to lend you assistance.

[FloridaFan]

We will see who is laughing when a lawsuit is filed. My investigation has found that Patrolman Courtney Dennis has a criminal record, and that the reason the Irmo Police acted so overzealously on March 18 was because the alleged victim is a former police officer, so naturally the brotherhood of brainless morons mentality kicked in and they violated Mr. Seay's rights. The defendant in this case, Jonathan Randell Litch, is due in court on July 28, perhaps to plead guilty.

As an individual who is rooting for Mr. Seay in this one, I can't wait until this case of State v. Litch is complete so that Mr. Seay can then file a Motion to Produce documents so he can prove and win his civil case against the Irmo Police.

For those of you who think that Terry v. Ohio can't be applied to a civil case here in S.C., I suggest ya'll hit the books and read the 1984 decision handed down by the S.C. Supreme Court in the case of Gathers v. Harris Teeter Supermarkets. In that case, the plaintiff Gathers was briefly detained by a North Charleston police officer on suspicion of shoplifting, and she was frisked even though the jury found there was no probable cause to detain the plaintiff. Since the police officer was an agent for the supermarket chain, the plaintiff Gathers won at trial. The facts in this case are very similar to the one's in Mr. Seay's case, and I have no doubt that he can prevail in any lawsuit against the town of Irmo pursuant to the South Carolina Torts Claims Act.

Mr. Seay, I see you e-mail address on a previous post, and I'll be contacting you shortly to lend you assistance.

Well, I am really glad that you can spit out court cases!! You are so smart, yet SUCH AN IDIOT. Courtney does NOT have a criminal record, but of course, you dont know him so I could see why you would say that. You OBVIOUSLY dont know the person who made this bogus complaint as well. As for the whole Charleston thing, patting down someone for FREAKIN SHOPLIFTING cant be compared to patting down someone who matches the description of a person who had just stolen 3 GUNS!!!!! But I am sure you didnt know that either. Come to think of it, what do you KNOW? Yeah, and I am sure you are going to get paid BIG BUCKS by some guy who lives with his mommy and daddy. KEEP WISHING!

[FloridaFan]

Q: There are 5 lawyers in a Suburban SUV and they are about to drive off of a cliff. What's wrong with that picture?

A: A Suburban seats 8.


Q: Why is it that many lawyers have broken noses?

A: From chasing parked ambulances.

[swampfox]

Somewhere I've got a list of hippies you can call if you need help.

[Unregistered]

We will see who is laughing when a lawsuit is filed. My investigation has found that Patrolman Courtney Dennis has a criminal record, and that the reason the Irmo Police acted so overzealously on March 18 was because the alleged victim is a former police officer, so naturally the brotherhood of brainless morons mentality kicked in and they violated Mr. Seay's rights. The defendant in this case, Jonathan Randell Litch, is due in court on July 28, perhaps to plead guilty.

As an individual who is rooting for Mr. Seay in this one, I can't wait until this case of State v. Litch is complete so that Mr. Seay can then file a Motion to Produce documents so he can prove and win his civil case against the Irmo Police.

For those of you who think that Terry v. Ohio can't be applied to a civil case here in S.C., I suggest ya'll hit the books and read the 1984 decision handed down by the S.C. Supreme Court in the case of Gathers v. Harris Teeter Supermarkets. In that case, the plaintiff Gathers was briefly detained by a North Charleston police officer on suspicion of shoplifting, and she was frisked even though the jury found there was no probable cause to detain the plaintiff. Since the police officer was an agent for the supermarket chain, the plaintiff Gathers won at trial. The facts in this case are very similar to the one's in Mr. Seay's case, and I have no doubt that he can prevail in any lawsuit against the town of Irmo pursuant to the South Carolina Torts Claims Act.

Mr. Seay, I see you e-mail address on a previous post, and I'll be contacting you shortly to lend you assistance.

Overzealous? The officers knew that the victim was a former police officer?
And all you have is Gathers v. Harris Teeter Supermarkets a 1984 decision.

The only brotherhood of brainless morons is see here would be you and Paul. I hope you do sue. Comedians are always looking for good material. Keep it coming guys.

Hey Paul, you better quit looking at kiddy porn and break open that piggy bank. This is not going to be cheap. If he is talking about Motions to Produce Document (yeah), and using fancey wording like " I have no doubt that he can prevail in any lawsuit against the town of Irmo" (oh my), then he must be a top notch, high priced lawyer. If I was the Town or Officer Dennis I would be shaking.

You guys are so funny... And my books are newer than 1984.

[Unregistered]

Since you two are doing legal research, I highly recommend you read Rule 11 of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure and the South Carolina Frivolous Civil Proceedings Act – 15-36-10, which will outline the sanctions you will subject yourself to when filing this moronic lawsuit.

[Unregistered]

Well my, some of these posts on here from "anonymous" sound like they may be from an, oh, I don't know, disgruntled 45 year-old female relative of Mr. Seay's who is still angry 41 years later that when she got molested as a 4 year old by a paternal uncle, her father treated her like the trash that she is and didn't even care enough to do anything about it to avenge her.(snicker)

That said, Courtney Dennis does indeed have a criminal record and no, I do not know him. Mr. Seay's residence and those he resides with notwithstanding, I can assure you that he makes a fairly good bit of money showing individuals his formula for computing difficult math equations, which he tells me he taught himself as a young lad. The guy is a friggin' human calculator.

Whoever could with a straight face honestly say that Mr. Seay resembles the defendant who was subsequently arrested for the home invasion of March 18 is living in a fantasy land. Gathers v. Harris Teeter Supermarkets is almost on point to the facts from Mr. Seay's case....the fact that one was being patted down in a search for different items is immaterial....the police in both cases had no probable cause and in Mr. Seay's case....it can be established that Patrolman Dennis already knew the identity of the perpetrator when he saw Mr. Seay's ID CARD. Again, Mr. Seay bears no resemblance to the defendant arrested save for being white and male.

[Unregistered]

Q: There are 5 lawyers in a Suburban SUV and they are about to drive off of a cliff. What's wrong with that picture?

A: A Suburban seats 8.


Q: Why is it that many lawyers have broken noses?

A: From chasing parked ambulances.



What do you call 400 lawyers at the bottom of Charleston Harbor?

A good start.


What do you call a half-empty busload of lawyers driving off a cliff?

A shame.


What do you call a full busload of lawyers driving off a cliff?

HILARIOUS!

[Unregistered Next Door]

Maybe the Irmo Police should spend some money on teaching their officers how to conduct a proper road side detention. I know that patrolman Courtney Dennis could sure benefit from such instruction. He stopped me on friday, March 18 at around 1:05 p.m. near the Irmo Bi-Lo and committed a battery against me disguised as a legitimate "Terry frisk", i.e. Terry v. Ohio(1968). I have filed a complaint against him with the Irmo Police Department.

Police officers no doubt have a tough job, but they shouldn't just get to put their hands on who they want when they want because they feel it is their entitlement.

Paul Seay
200 Cressfell Road
Irmo, SC 29063
(803) 781-5877

pseay@mail.com







HEY Paul, I forgot to wish you a happy belated birthday. Hope you choked on the cake after you forgot to remove the candles.

[Gator96]

.it can be established that Patrolman Dennis already knew the identity of the perpetrator when he saw Mr. Seay's ID CARD.


So you were driving with no license, Paul? Just an ID Card? :roll:

[cuebald]

Id? Sort of - it was a green card.

Most appropriate for interplanetary visitors, don't you think?

[swampfox]

I don't think it was an Id card.

Maybe a Superego card.

[TruthBTold]

It's really a shame that a 25 year-old married woman, whose name is spelled the same forward and backwards, has nothing better to do than repeatedly try to get me to notice her. Oh by the way, nice hopscotch graphic. At least it's not as graphic as the one you sent to your relative on her myspace profile. Whew that's a big girl.

Get a life!


Pauline, your biggest problem is trying figure out who we are, your next biggest problem is that we already know who YOU are. Have a nice day jailbird.

[swampfox]

Personally I don't care about your perversions, Paul. The ones that you've talked about explicitly are about as shocking as anything else you got.

It's just that this is not the place for it.

[Gator96]

It's really a shame that a 25 year-old married woman, whose name is spelled the same forward and backwards, has nothing better to do than repeatedly try to get me to notice her. Oh by the way, nice hopscotch graphic. At least it's not as graphic as the one you sent to your relative on her myspace profile. Whew that's a big girl.

Get a life!


You have no idea what *or who* you're talking about... Put a sock in it, stupid.

[better days]

BOB is the only name I know spelled the same forward and backwards.

[Captain Worley]

"A man, a plan, a canal: Panama!" is spelled the same backward and forward, but is a rather awkward name. A nom de guerre, perhaps?

[swampfox]

Paul, I strongly urge you to visit INS in Charleston and renounce your citizenship. A lot of people don't know that you can do this. Wherever you go, you can keep up with SC by way of this website.

That should be comforting. Eh?

[swampfox]

Right again, Grasshopper, and happy am I that my oversight did not go unnoticed.

I was addressing the issues raised by some of your statements. If you think all cops are "scum", and you deal with that onerous opinion by believing that all murderers should walk free, then you are only marginally doing your duty as a citizen. Certainly it is a citizen's duty to point out problems with our government and with our society in general. The other, more important part is to do something about it, even if that something is only to support and vote for candidates who seem willing to solve those problems, and then to hold their feet to the fire if they don't.

There are many fine men and women who are police officers. The scum is there, but it's a small blot on an otherwise honorable profession as is the case with all professions except politicians. Surely some are incorrectly convicted of crimes, but their numbers are relatively small. It's your broad brush that puts you in the same intellectual boat as racists, demogogues, and fanatics of all kinds.

So I will correct myself. IF you are a US citizen, I urge you to visit an INS office (in Charleston or Greenville, we don't have one here) and renounce your citizenship. It will allow you to look at the US more dispassionately, perhaps, and perhaps enlightenment and peace will result.

Shine on.

[Unregisteredpain]

"Swampfox" is Paul on Cressfell. It's like arguing with your mirror, isn't it?

[swampfox]

Dang! Try to keep a secret on this board!

And while were at it, "unregistered pain" is unregistered123, unregistered119, Bright Idea, SenatorfromIdaho, and several other IDs that he is terrified of people finding out about.

It's a tangled web, eh, boy?

[cuebald]

Swampfox, you know you can't be Paul on Cressfell. I'm Paul on Cressfell.

[swampfox]

Then who's that guy with the boat?

[cuebald]

Steamboat Worley.

He used to be the stunt double for Mickey Mouse.

[swampfox]

There's got to be insurance that covers this.

[ZooFuzz]

There's got to be insurance that covers this.


I think Mutual of Omaha will, if they'll cover Marlin Perkins, they'll cover anybody.

[Captain Worley]

Steamboat Worley.

He used to be the stunt double for Mickey Mouse.

Yeah, until that liar Mickey got me fired...

[swampfox]

Mickey has always been a liar and a fraud. Anybody believe that those are really his ears?

Once when I was returning from a trip overseas they were giving out Mickey ears to ALL of the passengers on the plane. It made the Americans easy to spot because no other adults would wear them.

We are a colorful people, Sahib.

[Storz]

I wish I would have joined this board earlier.
Is IRMO really getting that bad?
I noticed the last time I cruised thru Friarsgate that it was really turning into a dump...used to be a decient hood back about 15 years ago, I guess the rifraff have finally migrated up broad river road.
Hopefully the real estate prices have tanked in that area..glad I got out when I did...ex wife still lives there...guess she got what she deserved..now she is a ho in da hood :finga:

[ZooFuzz]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul on Cressfell
Maybe the Irmo Police should spend some money on teaching their officers how to conduct a proper road side detention. I know that patrolman Courtney Dennis could sure benefit from such instruction. He stopped me on friday, March 18 at around 1:05 p.m. near the Irmo Bi-Lo and committed a battery against me disguised as a legitimate "Terry frisk", i.e. Terry v. Ohio(1968-). I have filed a complaint against him with the Irmo Police Department.

Police officers no doubt have a tough job, but they shouldn't just get to put their hands on who they want when they want because they feel it is their entitlement.

Paul Seay

pseay@mail.com


How were you battered?
and how was it disguised as a terry frisk?




Paul, could you answer the following above question?

[watchdogforjustice]

I could not agree with you more!!!!!!!!!!! I spend over twenty-five years in law enforcement, I continually made more felony and misdemeanor cases than all the other officers in my region combined, but I did it while not violating their rights.

[JDidGirl]

I could not agree with you more!!!!!!!!!!! I spend over twenty-five years in law enforcement, I continually made more felony and misdemeanor cases than all the other officers in my region combined, but I did it while not violating their rights.

You just ressurected a thread that's been dead and gone for over two and a half years. Geez... bitter much? You know, you claim to have worked in law enforcement for a long period of time, but all it seems to me that you do is bash law enforcement officers. Are there some bad ones out there? Yes... but the good by far outweigh the bad. Have some respect for your brothers and sisters in blue... they are not all out to get you.