The Other Side of Harrison

[Anonymous]

I recently heard from some top people around Larry his real plan for this election. I was told that he plans to switch parties if he ever gets elected to an office and switch from Republican to Democrat. I was told that he figured he could not win in the general election so he would try running as a Republican in the primary - thinking he would have a better chance, and then switch to Democrat once in office. Sheriff Lott is helping put this plan together to advance the Democrat party in Lexington. This was one of the primary reasons why Larry anounced his campaign in Batesburg-Leesville which has the highest number of Democrat voters. If you go to his web site there are some indications of this plan. First, he is trying to build a Democrat base by encouraging Democrat voters to vote for him in the primary and working with the Democrat party to help his campaign (of coarse he has to also attend all the republican functions because it is Lexington County). If you listen to him talk and even read his website, he is more interested in advancing an unlimited number of social programs directed towards helping kids and doing community work. I think all of the ideas sound good, but shouldn't most of his programs be run by non-profit agencies or the schools - I mean, this is a time for limited government and lower taxes - but I guess Larry wants to expand law enforcement into the field of social services. I would hate to see what effect this has on our taxes. Just look at Larry's website and see if what he is talking about sounds more like a Republican or a Democrat. Of coarse this is why his website is short on details or even a plan to reduce crime, because then people might start asking him about the price tag; a price tag for what he calls "community policing" programs, many of which the National Institute of Justice found had little effect on crime. In fact someone should ask Larry if there is any evidence that his ideas would reduce crime. His idea of "community policing" sounds more like community fleecing. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against helping kids or working with the community, but they all sound nice in a campaign until the "republican" turns democrat and he turns cops into camp counselors.
Of coarse his supports will deny this plan because many of them don't know the truth - and Larry will deny it for now because he needs the republican dollars and try to split the republican vote, but give it time and the other side of Harrsion will appear. All the evidence of this plan is there if you look and listen. Just don't let him sell you the bipartisian line - he is not bipartisian just a democrat in republican clothing. I guess we can just wait and see.

[Anonymous]

Damn right! You sure have this guys' number. By the way, Harrison was the shooter on the grassy knoll and if you read his website backwards you get messages from the space monkeys.

[Anonymous]

The truth hurts, the truth hurts......, get used to saying that JFK, cause that will be a familar saying for you as time progresses.

[Anonymous]

Lies feel good. Lies feel good. You are ALREADY used to that one Tack Hammer!!

[Anonymous]

Let me see if I can get this straight. A man who has never run for office is going to run as a republican in a heavily republican county just so he can get elected. But he is really not a republican. No matter, the republican lever pulling mind numbed robots of Lexington county never actually bother to find out anything about the candidates. They just pull the lever. Right. Once elected, this guy with zero political experience, is going to throw off his political disguise and lead an uprising of all ten democrats in Lexington county. By mezmerizing children with socialist prorams he will consolidate his base of power and establish himself as an anchor of the democratic party of Lexington. You have got to be out of your ever living mind! Put the bong down very, very slowly and step back away from it. Whatever you put in it is not good for you and you should not play with it for a while (and neither should Sheriff Metts).

[Anonymous]

Don, I enjoyed your very funny response, although you are proving my point more than anything. First, Harrison wants to beat Metts, that is his primary goal (thus the reason for this rumor mill to talk bad about Metts, instead of using it as a forum for ideas) - he is not "using" the republican party just to advance his democrat beliefs but to get himself into office. Second, you are right, Harrison has no political experience which is why he thinks this plan might actually work. Third, switching parties happens all the time and it is not like he is over throwing the govenment, just using it to his ends. And yes - social programs - that is what his platform is based on, maybe you haven't been to his website or even talked to him. When you talk to him, ask him about his real post election plan that he loves to brag about. Oh, I am not sure about this "bong" thing, must be your liberal background coming out, or maybe your years as a drug user, or could it be - a narcotics officer - maybe an ex-narcotics officer, now working as a school resource officer.

You can call me a liar, thats OK (although get close to the Harrsion campaign and the real truth will come out). Harrison's plan will be revealed if he really starts advancing any ideas - instead of spreading rumors. Don't get me wrong, this little chat room is a great place for a laugh and a break from reality. However, when are we going to get Larry to provide some details? If he doesn't like the "gang problem" in Lexington County - what is he going to do about it. It doesn't seem like his taking any leadership role in Richland County to reduce gang violence -in fact, in Richland County there have been countless drive-by shootings and even some gang related fatalities - compared to NO gang related homicides in Lexington County. Larry talks about school safety and I heard today some kid got his head beat in at a Richland school. What did Larry do to make this school safer? Why didn't he prevent this from happening? If Larry has so many good ideas, why isn't he in a leadership position in Richland County.

Don - you are right, Larry has no political experience, has only rumors instead of ideas to direct his campaign, has followers that are angery that Metts with his few personality defects - can be such an effective leader, and most importantly is counting on the citizens of Lexington County to ignore the facts (as I have outlined) and be those "republican lever pulling mind numbed robots" as you refered to.

Really - it takes more than a half conceived plan to win an election, it takes ideas. Your right - what Larry is talking about when it comes to switching parties in foolish and crazy - thus the reason why Larry actually thinks it might work. I guess we will see - do some research and you may get a preview.

[Anonymous]

I have to say the citizens who visit this site can see the arrogance of the members of the sheriff’s department who post here. By your own admission you either currently work there or did. One even admits to being a supervisor. You insinuate that any supporter of Mr. Harrison’s is not capable of reading big words, etc.

I would say that 98% of the deputies at the department are outstanding officers and deserve our praise. Those who talk down to the citizens in such a manner, especially as a supervisor, are doing Sheriff Metts far more harm than good. It seems as if Sheriff Metts may not be in control of his department as has been suggested.

[heggas]

Just wondering if you knew what platform Metts is running on?

[Hammer time]

"a citizen," if that is all you truly have taken in out of all the postings, then I feel for you. You have grossly misinterpretated everything, either intentionally or unknowingly. If you look at the postings before pro Metts supporters started posting, then you will see how truly one-sided everything was. And for all you know, you could have very well interacted with some, or all, of the people who you say you have such disdain for here. You have mistaken arrogance for forthrightness. There is a big difference.

[Anonymous]

Other, what was I thinking? Listen, this is big! I mean really big! We have to get the word out about Harrison and his diabolical plans to subvert the political process and scuttle the Republican party in Lexington County. You are all that stands between the GOP and total annihilation. You, and you alone, can derail the dastardly destiny that Harrison and his minions have mapped out for our beloved county. You must act quickly.

You must immediately begin telling everyone you meet what you have shared on this website. I mean everyone. Don’t let anyone you encounter get away from you until you have fully informed them of Harrison’s turncoat intentions. Stand up in movie theaters, fast food restaurants, shopping malls….wherever people gather and tell this story.

Beware, Other. Harrisons’ hentchmen are everywhere. They will be easy to spot. If, when you are giving your informative impromptu lecture, someone burst into uncontrollable laughter it is one of them. Likewise, if they look at you with a dazed speechless stare, as though you have lobsters crawling out of your ears, it is one of them. If you encounter this reaction there is only one thing you can do; eat another paint chip and move on the next audience.

There is much work to do. God speed, Other.

[Anonymous]

Well it appears “The Others”, is deeply rooted in the Jimmy Metts campaign. It also seems that he is trying to scare the republicans in the county with lies.

The truth of the matter is that no one has “heard from the top people around Larry” anything about Larry having this democratic agenda. Why, because it is not true. The TRUTH is Larry is running on a platform of REMOVING politics from the sheriff’s department. This is something that is completely foreign to Jimmy Metts. Politics is his first priority, law enforcement isn’t. The posts here have reminded us of Metts’s history. He has spent the last 15 years trying to get elected, or appointed, to a bigger position. It is pretty obvious he really does not want to be the sheriff of Lexington County.

Larry did kick off his campaign in the Batesburg-Leesville area. If I remember correctly Jimmy Metts had also pissed off the entire community in his “crotch grabbing” hot headed display of temper. If I were running for sheriff and not interested in politics I would do exactly what Larry did. Go to the area where they are begging for a candidate!

If you check with past campaigns you will see that all candidates reach out for cross-over voters. Ronald Reagan was the best at it. Now we have George Bush who is almost as good as Reagan in doing it. “The Others”, I guess you feel they are closet democrats too? Nice try, but you will have to sell that somewhere else, no one in Lexington county is buying it.

You mention the “fleecing” of the community! Well, let us talk about the Lexington Sheriff’s Department budgets under the current regime!!! Let’s mention the tens of thousands of dollars spent to remodel the “executive wing”, the “waiting room” the sheriff had to have for visitors. Or the other extensive modifications the assistant sheriff had to have so his area would be as “plush” as Metts’s. What about the expensive vehicles that are bought or leased for Metts and James? Are they too good to drive unmarked Fords?

Or what about the cost to get the department CALEA Accredited? What about the costs to attend the CALEA conferences and the “fees” to CALEA??

How about some of those hidden items in the budget?

Let’s talk “fleecing”.

“The Others” you mention community oriented policing. Kind of stepping on Metts’s toes aren’t you? That was his buzzword since the mid-90’s. He created regions to help promote his idea of community oriented policing. I guess that means Jimmy Metts is actually Hillary Clinton in disguise, as Metts’s “social program” of community oriented policing started during the Clinton years.


You mention NO gang related homicides in Lexington County. You do not know what you are talking about! Remember the enormous gang problem with a nightclub on Saint Andrews road? Rival gang members left the club one night and one was shot and killed at the 7-11 down the street. No gang related homicides, huh?

I think “007” mentioned it with facts. A political unknown ran against Metts in the last election and received 23% of the vote and did it on a shoestring budget and in about a months time. This political unknown actually ran on the “Constitution Party” ticket. I can assure you that 23% of the voters in Lexington County are not members of the “Constitution Party”. Who then made up this 23%? Republicans mostly, the remainder democrats. Remember the percentages of people who voted and the breakdown by party? A LOT of republicans did not vote a straight party ticket, they voted for all of the other republicans and intentionally against Metts.

[Anonymous]

Thanks again for the funny responses - I enjoyed them and I think a little humour is good in politics. First, I am not deep rooted in the Metts campaign so you can call me a liar but that is a fact, I am a well informed citizen.

Ok, if Larry is not a Democrat thats fine - I heard some rumours and all the evidence was there to prove it. There is such a thing as liberal republican. But whatever, I guess we will see. Maybe Larry needs to define his position as a candidate instead of spreading rumours.

When did being a politician be such a bad thing. I mean, I don't have a problem with someone saying that Metts is a bad politician and Larry would be a good politician - But why run on a platiform, of no politics. It doesn't make sense.

Politicians in Washington DC help decide what federal grants the Sheriff's Department gets, County Council is a group of politicians elected by the citizens and control a good bit of funding to the Sheriff's Department, Politicians at the State House created and vote on laws that impact the Sheriff's Department and most importantly the deputies, and believe it or not most elected law enforcement officials in the state are politicians. So, my point is - shouldn't the citizens of Lexington County want an experienced politician like Metts that can get something done and work with all the other politicians. Political experience is a good thing and it HELPS in running a department. Why say - lets get rid of politics. Rather, wouldn't it make more sense to say - lets get experienced politicians to help the Sheriff's Department. Because Metts is an experienced politician, Deputies have working cars and there have been no job layoffs at the sheriff's department. Like I said, if you want to say Metts is a bad politician, fine (I think Metts is a good politician, but whatever I am sure you will disagree) but lets not get rid of politics - our founding fathers wanted a political system and good politicians even in law enforcement. Good politicians focus on advancing ideas, saying what is right - instead of what is wrong, and can win an election on their own merits instead of "crotch talking" and spreading rumours about their opponent.
I would love to hear a Larry supporter say - Ok this is what is wrong with the Sheriff's Department AND this is what Larry would do differently.

I will try to be quick with my next points.
I think Sheriff Metts wants to be Sheriff - he has had plenty of good opportunities to leave and after all he is running again.

Batesburg - Leesville - Interesting town, good BBQ (I would live there in a second, but I don't now). I wonder where all these people begging for a candidate were when Larry anounced he was running for sheriff. I heard that no one showed up for Larry's press conference, including the press. Also, I will be watching the Larry Harrison website waiting to see all the political endorsements from the Batesburg - Leesville politicans, I don't imagine I will see many.

Larry - getting crossover votes - Ok if that is what it is, I will take your word for it. He should probably work on his "republican" base before he starts going after the democrats, constitional party members, Nazis, communists etc. But if Larry is not a politician and wants to take politics out of the sheriff's department then does it really matter what he calls himself - ie democrat, republican whatever or where he gets his votes from. In fact if larry is not a politician, doesn't like politics, then why is he running for political office?

Fleecing - I like the word - has "a wolf in sheeps clothing" implications thus the reason why it came to mind when I was talking about Larry. I don't have knowledge of the inner workings of the sheriff's department so I will make some assumptions here. Besides the jail there have been relativley minor construction projects at the sheriff's department from what I have heard. I imagine all parts of the department need renovations including the executive areas. And I have heard that many areas in the department have been renovated and updated, not just the sheriff's office. What is Larry's stance on this - Does he want to build a new Headquarters building or does he want to let it fall to pieces. These are tough decisions - I don't know if a none politician like Larry can make the hard choices. Vehicles - I don't know what the sheriff drives or what Larry drives, but I guess Larry can trade in the Sheriff's vehicle if Larry gets into office and if that is were he wants to save money then I would be interested in hearing about all the cut backs he wants to make to the sheriff's department. Like I said I will be watching Larry's website and waiting for details.
CALEA - don't know much about it except for what I read on their website. Doesn't sound so bad. I read that a good number of agencies in South Carolina are accreditated. Isn't that a good thing? So I guess Larry is against accreditation for the sheriff's department? Is that on his website?

Community Oriented Policing - there is a good way and a bad way. I am for the good way and Metts seems to have a good community policing structure. How is Larry's concepts any different. Just from what I read...his ideas lack substance or even evidence that they would work - that is bad. But I will be waiting to see what ideas he offers - many tough decisions for larry - he wants to advance his version of community policing and doesn't really care if it works. I don't know..Larry is sounding more like a politician - a bad politician.

Gang homicides - I was talking about just this year. What you are talking about was three or four - maybe five years ago. One gang related homicide in five years is nothing compared to Richland and Columbia's record. Also, from what I read, that killing was not gang related, just a bunch of outrageous, out-of-control kids. Heck, Metts shut down that business and moved a lot of those thugs out of the county. I hope if Larry gets into office he doesn't bring all the gang members from Richland and Columbia with him.

You guys keep focusing on this 23% that voted against the sheriff in the last election. Well, every pollster on CNN, FOX, etc state that a 77% approval rating is not only great but outstanding. If Larry wants to go get that 23% again - thats fine, but just in case your math is off it takes 50.1% to win.

DVM - like your responses - very funny but lack substance. Must be very close to the Harrison campaign. Sarcaism is good but I would be interested in what the Harrison supporters think, WITH SUPPORTING FACTS, not just rumours and bathroom talk. Because trust me, I heard that there are plenty of rumours to go around, and Larry has been around.

[NODOUBT]

SAY IT WITH ME PEOPLE!!!! THERES NO PLACE LIKE HOME, THERES NO PLACE LIKE HOME.. And for God's sake.. click your heels and go back to Kanasa because Larry as a Democrat in disguise as Republican? Really, did you read what you wrote? Suck it up. He is a Republican running against another Good Ole Boy Republican. The difference. Larry is trying to do something positive and Metts is just no realizing it is re-election time and finally coming out of the slop house to meet and greet the public again.

Our bellies are full. Lets get someone fresh and clean. HARRISON FOR SHERIFF!!! :D

[Anonymous]

“The Others” you certainly have a different perspective on some things in this posting. Nice spin doctoring, but amateurish.

As time moves on I am sure you will see more information emerge from Mr. Harrison’s campaign. From what I have heard he has a solid platform and a great plan of execution. After all, grassroots campaigning works! Remember Spanky Bearden? What a tremendous grassroots effort!

As for Metts’s political background being a positive thing. Lawmakers should be politicians, law enforcers should not be! Law enforcement is there to enforce the law enacted by our lawmakers.

If Metts’s needed to be a politician to obtain grants to better the Lexington Sheriff’s Department that would be fine. But that is not the case. He is always looking to better himself, at the expense of the taxpayers. The Sheriff’s department was in turmoil when he was running for governor. He knew it, and he didn’t care.

He has turned his back on the department and the taxpayers too many times when he had other opportunities come up, whether they be political or business. Just look at his recent history of being a restaurateur. He wasn’t around the department for weeks at a time while he hung out at his restaurant.

As for the “fleecing”, it is there. To keep up with maintenance is one thing, to build the Taj Mahal is another.

Having a departmental standard is a good thing. But when money is tight why do you rob the taxpayers so you can achieve an accreditation standard requiring you to have certain administrative personnel while you are screaming that you need more enforcement officers. It sounds to me like priorities are mixed up.

An interesting spin you place on the statistics from the last election. You seem to loose sight of the fact that the 23% was obtained by a political unknown who did NOT campaign! Political analyst will tell you, based on those numbers and the lack of campaigning by the challenger, the incumbent is extremely vulnerable for defeat.

The concern is growing about the leaking of confidential employee records by those who should not have knowledge of them; it seems to be having a snowball effect. I believe this could be Metts’s “Willie Horton”.

Now consider the recent events of “crotch grabbing” and other shenanigans and you can see why the incumbent is so “vulnerable for defeat”.

[NODOUBT]

"Atwater" - Very positive and factual information. The points were well thought and I appreciate yet another positive turn on things. I believe that Larry is running a clean campaign which has dumbfounded alot of the Metts supporters.


"The Others", Hammertime, T-3 and anyone else hopping on a negative bandwagon:

Besides the little bit of dust that Metts has kicked up with really no supporting facts to his allegations, there has not been that much mud slinging and none on Larrys part which is commendable. For someone who appears to be sitting on the fence post, you have more support leaning on the heavy side with Metts and seem to have a lot of misinformation and allegations about Larry.

In that respect, since you obviously have so many unanswered questions about Larry Harrison and what his political agenda may or may not be and what his views are for the growth and administration of the Sheriffs Department, I would encourage you to meet him at one of the many meet and greet functions that he has. I have attended a few in the past to get those questions answered myself. In addition, you may need to mark your calendar for an upcoming event where he will be present. I read that he will be participating in the Parade in Boiling Springs this Sunday and I would certainly encourage you to go and meet with him with your questions and/or concerns.

Furthermore, for someone who appears to be very educated and trying to appear impartial, you insinuted and speculated on a lot of things about Larry with no real facts or supporting data. I would encourage you to be receptive to receiving factual information about his campaigning, beliefs, goals/objectives before you make up your mind about the kind of candidate/Sheriff he will make. I suspect that no one in this world is perfect. Even you. I am sure that there are things in your past that you look back on and now would have done differently. I don't see anything in Mr. Harrisons record that I find offensive or illegal. I have seen a lot of positive things from him that I have failed to see with the current Sheriff. I have failed to see Sheriff Metts participate in anything in our County that was not finanically or politically driven. I have not seen him go to our schools and educate our teachers, children and parents. I have not seen him come up with pro-active ways to decrease violence in schools and to give children incentive to be better citizens. I have seen him cut much needed programs from the budget that would have enhanced our community and the education of our children about drugs, gangs and other malicious activities that DO HAPPEN in our County. There are rapist who live in our neighborhoods that we are never made aware of. I had to make the school district change a bus stop that was dropping children off at the driveway of a convicted child rapist. That is just one of many examples of the things that I believe Mr. Harrison can change in our County and do to make things safer for our children and communities. He is young, he has been around, you are correct. He rolls his sleeves up and works along side his men and not behind the desk where he tries to glorify himself instead of giving our men in blue the credit and support they deserve. No, not all deputies in the Lexington County Sheriff Department are supportive of Larry. But, you should look at it from an employers perspective. "If you cannot hire and maintain loyal employees, what is your incentive to keep them on payroll". The truth is that there are several LCSD, State Troopers and other politicians who support Larry. They are also the same people who have bills to pay, children to raise and need the income that they receive from their jobs. They have to put their families above their political views and ethics. As I can only assume you would do for your family. No, you may not see postings all over his site endorsing him. But, I know for certain that there are several individuals of statue who do support him and don't feel the need to do it publically. Some have to do it silently out of necessity and others do it because of confidence that Larry can and will get the job done. He will continue to walk the pavement, shake the hands of the people he plans to protect, educate and serve. I don't recall once when I have seen Sheriff Metts do any of that.

Point: Don't cast stones when you live in a glass house.

[Anonymous]

NODOUBT _ I must have missed a posting - I haven't read much of anything were any Metts supporters have attacked Larry's personal life on this site, however the crotch talk about the sheriff is everywhere. What are you referring to in your post? I agree that this campaign/election will run better if both individuals stick with their records (good or bad) and focus on the law enforcement stuff. NODOUBT and Att Water - At last talk about Larry's ideas. I am open to ideas from all sides - the best thing about this site is talking about problems in the county and figuring how solutions can be developed. I will try to catch up with Larry in the near future and see what he says about a variety of problems in Lexington County.
A few quick responses - "Amatuerish" - Ok I don't have a problem with that, however I think cops can and should be good politicians. But you have already stated your disagreement with that idea so I will leave it at that.

The sheriff's department (including the executive area) is hardly a palace. Although, there are many renovations needed - I plan to ask Larry what his ideas are -

You keep using the "Spin" word. I am not trying to spin anything but provide a different side. I think Lexington County is growing enough that no matter who runs against the sheriff - that person could get 20-30% of the vote. I don't think that is saying anything negative against the sheriff, heck George Bush got less than 50% of the vote in the last election and I would rather have him in office and that says nothing about his vulnerability in the next election. In fact, I think howard Dean is in big trouble against Bush..but national politics can be discussed at another time......

Standards...I think we need people in administrative functions and on the road patrolling. I don't think it is a choose this or that scenerio and if there is one person at the sheriff's department being sure that it maintains the highest level of professionalism - then thats fine..but I undertand your disagreement. Tough choices, again another question for Larry.

My last question is for the Larry supporters (and answer truthfully, it is not meant to be a trick question)

I know some people think I am crazy saying that Larry is really a democrat or thinking about switching... So lets think of a more plausable scenerio.

If Larry loses the primary and switches to the Independent Party for the general election would you still vote for him. Just a question...I am sure Larry would ask you if he could on this forum - so I will do it for him.

[NODOUBT]

Hammertime:

In response to your comment, if you read in the top portion of this post, you will note where that information that I referred to is located.

Secondly, in response to your question regarding where a supporter would stand if Larry decided to change from Rep to Dem? My point of view and practice is that when you support someone, it should not be just ONE THING that qualifies that person as a good candidate and worthy of a position.

If he chose to switch parties, (which I firmly believe will never happen) the question would be would he still do a good job in office? Will he still adhere to the same platform that he is now standing on which involves opening communication to the Citizens of Lexington County, educating and protecting our youth and protecting and serving our community in a uniform and proactive approach?

That is the person you are voting for. Not the Republican Candidate or the Democratic Candidate. The big picture is the actual JOB that we need to be done in the Sheriffs office. Not where he stands as a politician. People put way to much thought into politics and not enough into achieving set objectives and goals. Democracy is great, but it really has no place in what makes a candidate good or bad for a position.

I personally, don't believe that politics play that big of a part in this election. I think that people need to see the big picture, which is that we need a change. Whether it is Larry Harrison or another candidate the bottom line is that Sheriff Metts has been ineffective and stale for many years. His ideas and administration are stale, the morale in the Sheriffs Department clearly has some adminsitrative issues and unfortunately for the citizens of Lexington County, those type of issues can be like cancer and spread among everyone and everything. It clearly has a dominoe effect, which is unproductive.

Hammertime, you may not like Larry as a person, which comes out very strongly in the comments you have made throughout this website. But, as a past employee at LCSD, Larry had a very positive and proactive record.

In addition, he has carried forth that positive record with him into the RCSD and rose above the negativity and suspect allegations made by those FEW people at the LCSD.

From what I can see and have read, Larry has a very impressive law enforcement record that sets him apart from previous candidates. In addition, the fact that he is still in his forties is a plus. I think we need to have more Sheriffs who get involved in the community and are capable of working along side of their fellow officiers. Larry was a fellow officer at LCSD and has the tenancity and education to make a very competent Sheriff. One that will make strong changes in our community and within the infrastructure of the Sheriffs Department administration.

He is someone who will be able to build on the current budget and make the tuff decisions that comes with the financial aspect of this position. It's not all about policing. There are several aspects of this position and from what I have been able to see thus far, he is very qualified to walk into that office and make ALL the decisions and changes that are necessary to make it a productive, financially stable and community oriented Sheriffs Deparment.

Short and sweet. He would have my vote if he were Republican/Democratic/Independent or just plain Larry Harrison.

Because he has more experience, knowledge and work ethics to offer our Community than the incumbent. That is why he is a better choice!

[Anonymous]

I just couldnt resist: I know this string has been dead for awhile but, I was wondering, if Larry is such a great police officer with all this talent, experience and knowledge, why did a sheriff across the river make him a school resource officer and not ANYWHERE higher up the food chain? Secondly, even if there were no openings anywhere when he was hired, why hasn't he moved up since then? Seems to me that he got pegged there by another knowlegable intelligent, experienced Sheriff. HHHmmmmmm.. . .. . . .

[Anonymous]

Why Wyatt, are you saying that a School Resource Officer is not an important job? Are you saying that the protection and the education of our 1100 children at Dutch Fork, and over 50,000 children is a job for a loser? Sounds a lot like Metts. It a political necessity for Metts. Put them in, and forget about them. Is that what you are saying Wyatt? :shock:

[Anonymous]

That's 50,000 children in Lexington county that these 20 SROs are responsible for. :shock:

[Anonymous]

I never said it is not an important job. A probationary firefigher is an important job, but does not have the responsibility of the engineer or captain. All I am asking is, that if Harrison is such a great officer, then why hasn't he been placed in a position with some real authority. I can figure that no answer will be forthcoming, because there is no way to spin this.

[Anonymous]

Maybe he wants to be there wyatt, ever think of that. Just cause he is not in a higher ranking position does not mean squat. How much more responsibility does he need to have, the care of 1100 kids. Hmmmmm that seems like a huge responsibility to me. Dont talk about what you dont know about. Le me guess you already know what its like to be a school resource officer, cause you know everything...

[Anonymous]

I must have misinterpeted your post on Harrison. Must have been the statement of "why did a sheriff across the river make hima school resource officer and not ANYWHERE higher up the food chain?" I have children in Lexington schools, and I feel their safety and education are my top priority. Since the sheriff on this site of the river is not around in the county to see the gang problems and the other problems in the school, I for one am glad that there is a caring deputy in their school, who can provide a postive role model. These deputies show our children that there is a human side of a deputy. A deputy who is down to earth, who is not there to judge them, like a foster parent. Maybe the sheriff on this side of the river can not understand that, but for me as a parent of a high and middle schooler, I find it extremely important. I find the relationship I have with these deputies is important. My wife and I have another set of eyes on our children. Again maybe the sheriff on this side of the river can not understand that, but hopefully you do, if you are a concerned parent Wyatt.

Why don't you join me and show support for Harrison, who understands our concerns about our children, drugs, gangs, and crime in our county. It is time for a full time sheriff, nobody argues that Metts is a part time sheriff, part time teacher and part time restaurant owner.

You can't use lack of experience as something against Harrison. Metts himself states he was the "youngest sheriff" elected in 1972. He started as a "dispatcher" for in West Columbia in 1969. How much experience did Metts have? NONE! Now it is time for a change and new blood to come in for the county. Harrison has experience in supervising, drugs, gangs, and children. Some say Harrison was a bad supervisor. Well we know that Metts has no clue on what is going on in his department. No clue about the gangs WE see in the schools and in the county. No clue about the drug probelm. No clue about the childrens' needs in the schools. He isn't around to get a clue. :shock:

[Anonymous]

Authority Wyatt ? Let your child get beat up or arrested by a deputy. You'll understand what authority he has !

[Anonymous]

Seems I hit a very sensitive issue. Let me get this right, a school resource officer is more important than other positions within the Sheriff's office? Hmmmm. Therefore, I guess that a road deputy, with no supervisory experience is just as qualified as Harrison? Oh yea, I forgot, he USE to supervise the narcotics division. Ok, now I think I got it, someone who at one time had a supervisor position, was fired, and then hired at a position with no supervisor responsibilities by another agency is qualified to be Sheriff. Oh and I forgot, the non-supervisory role is a step in building a career as an experienced law officer. Hmmmm. You know my grandfather use to tell me that if it smells like crap and looks like crap, there ain't no need to taste it. Keep serving up the poo, without answering the question and Jimmy will be re-elected.

[Anonymous]

Just heard about this site and I find it very interesting, though I live on the "other side of the river". I have read the posts concerning Mr. Harrison and how he is described or portrayed as a poor supervisor, bad Cop and just an evil person, this is nothing new to us in Richland County for we have heard this type of rhetoric before. Some years ago, an experienced Law Enforcement Officer, such as Mr. Harrison, ran for office here in my County and the very same things were said about him. Funny thing though, he won! Sheriff Lott has done a fine job and is running for his THIRD term, UN-OPPOSED! I hope Voters see through the hype and fight the Good Old Boy system that Lexington County has; we did and are better for it!

[Anonymous]

But had Lott been fired? I really dont know. I do not think that he went from a school resource officer to Sheriff. I could be wrong because I do not pay attention to the other side of the river very much. Just wondering since you made the comparison.

[Anonymous]

School Resource Office is just one part of Harrison's resume. We know Jimmy started as a dispatcher. Do we know if he was anything more then just a dispatcher? We ASSUME he did, but his "bio" does not state that, now does it Wyatt? I am sure that West Columbia Police Department was a very large department in 1969. Say about 5, but no more then 10 people? I am sure that Harrison has more experince now, then Jimmy had when he first ran for sheriff. Harrison understands the gangs, the drugs, crime, and children. Jimmy has to read it off from a report that someone else prepares, not having a CLUE if it is true or not. Wyatt, ANYONE can these reports, but Harrison is the one, between him and Metts, who would clearly understand in detail and whether or not it is BS. As for your School Resource Officer comment I can tell you either don't have children, don't care about children, or completely have no respect for the School Resource Officers or a combination of all three. Why don't you try to get hire as a School Resource Officer and see if you can HANDLE it. They have my absolute respect, and with all of Harrison's other positions, I feel he is above and beyond the pretend teacher of Charleston Southern.

[Anonymous]

Wyatt, Sheriff Lott was fired by then Sheriff Sloan, whom he defeated in his first run for the office!

[Anonymous]

Avid, thank you for the info. I did not know that. Now Mett's Fantasy World, what is your deal? Where in the world did Harrison get all this experience dealing with gangs? Where did he get experience with crimes other than drugs? If he was running for head school resource officer, I could understand it, but he's not. Dont just make a statement that he has experience. Show me where he has the experience. What did he do? Did he take classes? Did he deal with these issues day in and day out? If he did for how long? The biggest problem with Harrison supporters is the lack of information and just making statements. You seem to know alot about Harrison, so give it up. Where is the experience. The first sign of a bad campain is to run based on the other guys faults. Better campains are run on the candidates strenghts. What are Harrison's? ( and please dont say his expereience again, what experience, where, how, when ) I've said it before, and I'll say it again, I don't like Jimmy Metts, but crime is down, cases get solved, and I feel safe. Tell me why I should vote for Harrison. Don't tell me the budget problems, because I don't care, as long as my grandkids are safe I don't see a problem with the budget. Dont tell me about the new court house, because that has been a mess since the county failed to hire a project manager. Don't tell me about who is sleeping with who, because everyone has faults. Dont' tell me about moral at the SD being bad, because I know that is not true. Tell me about the man and what he has to offer and where that knowledge came from. Tell me why he never got promoted when his Lt. was in trouble. Get real and tell me why I should vote for him. If you truly believe in him there has to be a reason. WHY?

[Spud]

Seems I hit a very sensitive issue. Let me get this right, a school resource officer is more important than other positions within the Sheriff's office? Hmmmm. Therefore, I guess that a road deputy, with no supervisory experience is just as qualified as Harrison? Oh yea, I forgot, he USE to supervise the narcotics division. Ok, now I think I got it, someone who at one time had a supervisor position, was fired, and then hired at a position with no supervisor responsibilities by another agency is qualified to be Sheriff. Oh and I forgot, the non-supervisory role is a step in building a career as an experienced law officer. Hmmmm. You know my grandfather use to tell me that if it smells like crap and looks like crap, there ain't no need to taste it. Keep serving up the poo, without answering the question and Jimmy will be re-elected.

Actually Harrison was a supervisor IN the Narcotics Division. When Peak was sent on vacation for his DUI arrest (by Mayfield) Harrison got the job by default. Had Peak been able to stay out of the bottle or from behind the wheel of his car while drunk, Harrison would still be a sargent on narcotics if he was able to keep it in his pants.

[Anonymous]

Harrison was never Lt., was he? That would be news to me.

[Anonymous]

Well, well, well, I see the two Jo(h)ns stepped up to play a while. Worried about those jobs, Boys? :twisted:

[Anonymous]

Wyatt,
You mean you don't have access to Harrison's personnel file???

[Anonymous]

Sugerfree, you are very funny, but still no reason for voting for Harrison.

[Anonymous]

Wyatt for some reason you, Hammertime and the other Barneys on here seem to have a problem with real facts. You blow up a lot of dust and dirty the air; Yet you and the others all reek from the same stinch :toimonst: (Smells like Metts boys to me)!

Where is all the proof, facts or NEW and IMPROVED 411 that you have? What are you contributing here to make anyone on this forum think that Harrison is someone we shouldn't vote for? If anything you're a prime example of why we need someone NEW in LCSD office, to clean up the problem you people clearly have in-house, so the focus can be on what you do in our communties to make it a better place for our children to live and play. You people are like a soap opera over there. Talk about casting stones. It appears from this website there are A LOT of Deputies, Supervisors, etc.. Living in glass houses.

You appear to be more of a disgruntled, infantile brat who's afraid to lose his job when Harrison takes office than a concerned voter with actual proof and information that REAL VOTERS need to know. This does bear repeating "PUT UP OR SHUT UP" or whining on this forum is taking up valid comments and information from interesting people with REAL knowledge.

If I were you, I would focus more on doing my job and less on kissing Metts behind. That way, regardless of the outcome you might still be employed! :axe:

[Anonymous]

That is hilarious!! You think I work at the SD? What a laugh!!! Trust me, my job is so secure that I never have anything to worry about. I guess you can say I am untouchable. Planning ahead for retirment is a good thing. Allows you to do what you want, not what you have to. I have not cast stones, if so I appoligize for it. That was not my intent. My only reason for posting is to give insight I have into certain events that others have chosen to tell half truths about or just out and out lie. I further find it interesting that no one has posted WHY they will vote for Harrison. The only thing I keep hearing is why people will vote against Metts. Reality, I will ask you the same question, Why will you vote for Harrison? Please give detailed reasons as I outlined above which don't include the meaningless topics posted here or how bad Metts is. What does Harrison have to offer?

[Anonymous]

Wyatt, I accept that. It's a fair enough question. I'll answer the best I can.

First: He has a commendable resume. He has put in his years of service in Law Enforcement. The thing that I found to be the most important was not just that he has so many years, but that he has many years of service and qualifications in impactful areas of Law Enforcement.

I don't believe that you should ask someone to do work for you or do a job that you can't efficiently handle and comprehend yourself. It shows strong charachter and is a quality that earns respect and keeps morale in a more positive light. When you act like you are above everyone else, make demands and attempt to supervise individuals in a job that you are not qualified to do, but feel the need to dicate over, you become less effective and therefore less efficient in managing. I have found in observing the campaigning that Harrison has done, he has proven to be a stellar individual who acts like he is no better than any of the volunteers he has working with him. In addition, my understanding is that over the years he has managed and treated his colleagues and team members in the same light.

Secondly. Harrison is a business man. He's not an idiot. He can efficiently handle the budget and hopefully with the him in office a reform will take place that will actually reduce the budget in half, if not more. That is a savings in the long run that will eventually make it's way back to us tax payors. The mindset is an important element when overseeing a large budget. Over time, when you are administering over a large budget, some individuals become less efficient with the spending.

They throw away money in areas that are practically useless and fluff, when they could have been allocated in a more productive manner to more needed and beneficial projects. Since Harrison is willing to relinquish the purse strings and allow the control to go back out into some symbol of population, then there will be a more watchful eye over what is happening with our tax dollars and a better attempt made at using them more conservatively and in more productive matters.

Third: With new and younger faces you bring to the table more innovative ideas. Our County has not had any real meaningful ideas in quite a while. With Harrison I have seen him in the school system, with his Charity program, etc. and his mind is constantly turning with new concepts and ideas that if they come to fruition will allow our Community and Law Enforcement to come to understand each other a little better. In addition, it will allow for more educational program opportunities and a more officier friendly community enviornment. Now, before you jump to conclusions. I don't mean we need a community of officiers who play hop scotch with our kids in the streets and bring cookies by to introduce themselves. Quite the opposite. I believe we need to reinforce that our Law Enforcement is here to protect and serve the citizens of Lexington County. By becoming more visible in our communities, having more contacts with our schools and having PTA meetings that include our local law enforcement with updates on gangs and the latest "Need To Know's" in our community. Not just when it happens and the Sheriff is attempting to do damage control. Late breaking news is just that LATE!

Prevention is Key to stopping a lot of the negatives that happen in our Society. I have heard and seen innovative ideas and approaches that work and I have heard Harrison speak of them in public. They are sound and practical ideas that will be very effective. The ideas have been stale for a very long time at LCSD. (By the way, Kudos that you don't work there and are stable and employed elsewhere). However, there are several men and women who are still employed there. It's really interesting. When I am out in a restaraunt or store and I see a LCSD, if I have a moment I try to talk with them to see what they think about the candidates. The most concerning is that these men and women appear to be ready for a change to. If you have no loyalty from the men and women who you employ and you have no knowledge or capability to get out there and work beside them when necessary, how effective can you really be in your job?

I see Harrison as being effective for that very reason. He does have a vast knowledge of his job, other law enforcement jobs including SRO which makes him even more diverse in Law Enforcement because he has been in dispatching and worked all realms and still does.

You see the most interesting thing to all of this is that regardless of what has come this mans way, he has allowed nothing and no task become to menial for Mr. Harrison. Especially when it comes to protecting, serving and working in our community. That is exactly the kind of Sheriff we need. One that is willing to work at serving and protecting us on ALL LEVELS!

Has it not clicked with anyone that Harrison actually wanted to learn what being an SRO was, so that he had a better understanding of what the demands and needs are in that position? Because unless you guys have walked it, you have no clue. The kids are not the only ones who rely heavily on SRO's. School officials, staff and even us parents rely on these men and women to take care of our kids while they are at school and keep them safe.

One last note. I have met Sheriff Lott several times. He doesn't strike me as someone who HAS to employ ANYONE. Sheriff Lott was never OBLIGATED to hire Harrison or anyone else. Does anyone know if Harrison was offered a higher ranking position and turned it down? I know the answer to that question. I think maybe some of you guys might want to check that out instead of making accussations about something you really don't know much about.

I hope that answers your questions Wyatt. :razz:

Have a nice weekend.

[Anonymous]

Good politician's answer. A whole lot of fluff with no meat. What qualifications does he have? What innovative programs will he try to impliment? Where will he cut the budget? What will he do to improve morale (which I do not believe is bad anyway)? I mean come on, the County still has to approve major expendatures and salaries, crime is down in Lexington County, and after asking for reasons I keep getting fluff. I'll say it again, I don't like Jimmy Metts but my kids families are safe and so are my wife and I. Why change? What will change? How will it change? Your answer sounds like it came from Bush or Kerry. "Stay the course" what does that mean. "Complete the job" how? Give me some real answers, not fluff. We are not talking about rocket science here.

[Anonymous]

Wyatt,

You asked me for why I wanted to vote for Harrison. I gave you those reasons. However, what it appears you are looking for is his platform. That is easily accessible on his website.

If you are looking for qualifications, again easily accessible if you click the button. Now, what you are really shooting for here is comparing apples to apples. For someone who tries to be in "The know" about what happens within the Sheriffs Department you have to be walking through it deaf, dumb and blind not to see and feel the underlying tension in the place.

As far as comparing apples to apples. Since Harrison has never been Sheriff before, it's a tad bit hard to accomplish that feat. However, once he is in office for the first year, I will be glad to send you a comparison that allows you to see what having fresh ideas in a stale enviornment can do for an organization. You talk about fluff Wyatt. What exactly has Jimmy done for us lately. Just because he posted a few signs in your neighborhood doesn't mean crime is really down passed the normal levels that is expected from year to year. Let me guess, you believe that the numbers are actually 100% factual? Based on what? The polls that Metts people ran and then published. Hell, any idiot can do that and put it on a sign. The bigger picture here is weighing what the good man has done in thirty years as opposed to what Harrison is willing to do his first year and then through term.

I am 100% REPUBLICAN! I don't pretend to teeter totter between candidates. You either support one or you don't. For someone who claims not to be a Metts supporter sir, you reek of it.

Wyatt, the information and facts that you keep requesting have been answered over and over by everyone and also on the candidates website. I think the information you are looking for is on the website, first you have to look it up and the actually read it. If that doesn't answer your question then I would certainly suggest doing what I did. CALL THE MAN and meet with him to gain the answers to those questions.

You see, he is accessible to the public. Something that is very endearing to a voter who really wants the answers to his questions. Have you picked the phone up yet Wyatt? If not, then why? If you want to know why you should vote for him, why the hell don't you ask Harrison why he deserves your vote?

Such a simple solution for the individuals who post and ask WHY VOTE? Either you like the guy or you don't. If you don't, thats the American way. But don't ask people to continue to justify their voting logic if you don't really want the real answers. You sound intelligent Wyatt. Use some common sense logic now and APPLY IT!!

[Anonymous]

I have been to his website, I have talked to him, and I have asked questions. What I am seeing is the same fluff with no real meat. No real answers to how, when, where, and why from the man himself, his website, or his supporters. Therefore I will just assume that there is no substance since no one can give any. I don't want to do that, but here it is obvious that I am surrounded by Harrison supporters who really dont know what he will do. That is sad.

[Anonymous]

And maybe I should be clearer with my question, Why should I vote for Harrison?

[Anonymous]

Here's another question Wyatt. Why has jimmy showed for ANY of the debates with Harrison? 2 of these debates were set up by jimmy or his people. Check with the people in Irmo, West Columbia and Batesburg Leesville. These are facts Wyatt. Why did jimmy not show for the gang forum in Irmo. Lott did along with his people that could and did answer all the question from the public. jimmy was a no show. Why? I do not expect you to have the answer Wyatt, but I would expect you to ask yourself the same question. Is there a gang problem? I believe so. Why was jimmy not present during this meeting in Irmo? We know he had plenty of notice, a couple of his people showed. If it is important to the citizens and if it is a concern; I would say a major one but that's me, why did he not or why did jimmy refuse to come? Wyatt I think these are important issues and it showed my what kind of person jimmy is. The thing about jimmy grabbing his crotch; towards the lady town manager is also true. This again shows me the kind of person he is. No lady should every be subjected to that kind of treatment, under no circumstances. Again these are facts Wyatt. Everyone knows them to be absolutely true.

We also know that jimmy teaches in Charleson. That is a 2 hour trip there and 2 hours back. Most college classes last for 1 1/2 hours. We strongly believe that jimmy using his county leased SUV and uses county gas. How many times does he teach a week? This is abuse of taxpayer money, no questions about that at all. We also know that jimmy is or was the owner of a restaurant in Batesburg Leesville. Wyatt, if you own a business you spend A LOT of time there to ensure that it is being run correctly. My question, as well as your's should be, who is running the Sheriff's Department. We ELECTED and PAID jimmy to run the department, not James. I don't care how will or not will James did the job, it jimmy's RESPONSIBILTY.

Rumors are Harrison had sex outside his marriage. Rumors are that jimmy had sex outside his marriage. Rumors are that jimmy is or was a silent partner of a stip club run by a very good friend Kermit. We can go ALL day on rumors, and some people have tried to start some, like Harrison was fired for having sex with this woman, who was a drug dealer. This one was a double edged sword. If she was or is, and she is still married to the same deputy, who has access to MOST sensitive material in the sheriff's department. One most ask why. Is he has access, then sooner or later she'll have access. Why are the people; mainly the ones who started this rumor, still letting this go on? If the rumor were true, what kind of person is jimmy for allowing it? ;-)

[Anonymous]

I sorry guys, made a mistake above. That is suppose to be why has jimmy not showed. I am truely sorry. My mistake.

Fluff Wyatt? Do you really not think that jimmy does not fluff up his staff. You are taking everything he puts out as fact. I have looked for the Crime stats for 2003, but SLED does not have them out yet. SLED states they are still going over all the information and it'll still take some time for those stats to some out. Check out their site.

[Anonymous]

Wyatt,
No one is going to try and sway you to vote either way. You were correct when you said crime is down. However, what did Metts have to do with it? You can thank those of us who were actually out doing the work. You said you and your family is safe so why change things. Well isn't that just typical. As long as you are not being victimized, screw every one else. Maybe you should be greatful for that reason and listen to what the people who work there have to say, you could learn a few things. I am not here to try and change your mind. I could care less what you think. I just don't think you have a clue what really goes on. You can read it for yourself or you can remain in denial. As long as you are safe, who cares right?

[Anonymous]

Well said Sugar Free and Fantasy... Wyatt, I almost have to think that you are Jimmy himself living vicariously through the fantasy name Wyatt Earp! For someone who wants answers, you continue to close yourself off from them. You asked the man (Harrison) himself why you should vote for him and you feel like you didn't come away with any meat.

Here is a question that I think you can answer with all your "In the Know" knowledge you place on this forum.

What is it that YOU believe qualifies a candidate to be the Sheriff of Lexington County? Not what Jimmy Metts platform and credentials are, not what Harrisons platform and credentials are.

What does the great Wyatt think that the Sheriff of Lexington County needs in order to be an effective and qualified candidate.

Evidentally you have some kind of "in the know" criteria for qualifying these candidates that we are not privy too. I am most interested in learning what your checks and balance system is for a qualified candidate.

Also, if you are not pro Metts or pro Harrison. Why do you really care? Clearly your not going to make any real decision here on this forum. :shock: You asked us voters why we support Harrison. We gave you our reasons. Then you act offended and toss out that we are Harrison supporters.. No offense man, but you were told several times who I supported and who some of the other individuals on this forum supported. Yet, you almost sounded in shock that you were talking to some Harrison supporters. Get your head out the sand man! It is a diverse forum. But, when you start asking specific questions, something should clue you in as to whether you are corresponding with a Pro Harrison or Pro Metts supporter.

Furthermore, you're very quick to respond to anything posted on here regarding Metts with ease. You even attempt to fluff him up and come to his defense. Dare I say you should be classed as a "Metts Supporter" now? Basically, you reek of Metts himself or one of his hired flunkies who watch this sight for insight on what Harrison might be doing next. Sad, but so true.

You see, eventually the "real" great Wyatt made mistakes. Pony up Wyatt!!! Answer the bigger question here. What criteria is required to be the Sheriff of Lexington County. Excluding both candidates and their platforms.
:finga:

[Anonymous]

Another good political move, reverse the question. Sugarfree, I guess that Metts hiring you or putting someone else in place to hire you was a good move since you are a good officer. As far as Metts not showing up to debates, its a good point, but once again overlooks the obvious. He is the incumbant who is doing the job now. Take for instance John Kerry he has been stumping for a very long time. I guess we should fault George Bush for not starting his campain yet. The problem I see is that the incumbant has a job to do. The challenger wants the job therefore has more time agruably. Now I am sure you will all say that Harrison has a job but still has time and cares about the citizens more because he makes time to show up. That is a good point. But that does not take into account that Harrison job is a set time and Metts isnt.
Now as far as why vote for Metts, I believe that if it ain't broke dont fix it. And if there are small problems the fix may be worse that the problem. Right now we know who the Sheriff is and how the department works. I haven't seen anything that says how Harrison will do anything. That is what I am asking for from you guys. WHAT IS HARRISON GOING TO DO AND WHY?

[Anonymous]

Wyatt, Metts set up 2 of these debates. Why did he NOT show for the debates he set up? Would you, sir, set up an appointment with the citizens,; customers, then not come to that appointment. In my business, that person would be fired, no questions. You know that, I know that.

[Anonymous]

Nice try Wyatt. But no go. Political move? No. Actually, what that is called is common sense. Your great at trying to twist this about, unfortunately you are more inclined to dodge any specific questions. I asked you exactly what you wanted in a Sheriff and blew up dust. You asked me what I wanted, I told you. I'm not interested in whether you received a warm fuzzy feeling from my response. I told you what my criteria was. Now, once again "Pony Up Wyatt". You talk a good game, where's your meat? Clearly, you feel there is something lacking in what we require in a Sheriff. What is it that you would like to see in a Sheriff? Your safe. Great, thank the Deputies who keep you and your family that way. You have heard directly from a LC Deputy who is not impressed with current administration and the lack thereof, yet you continue to toot Jimmy's horn. That's right! Your not for either candidate here. Your just here posting for giggles and grins.

Riddle me this Wyatt? If your not interested in voting for either candidate and you don't have any criteria in which you deem qualification worthy in a candidate, then why make a comment that has no real "meat" in it?

There are substantial valid facts on here that clearly show why Metts has long past his stay. It shows a "broken incumbant". There is a need for "fixing". The only difference is in the supporters here. Either your candidate is Metts and we are aware that your opinion is that "it's not broken". Whereas, Harrison supporters see not only something "broken" but that is outdated and beyond repair. Enough shop talk Wyatt. If you have a valid reason NOT to Vote for Harrison, I'm up for hearing that one too. Actually, I would also like to hear from you a valid reason TO VOTE for Jimmy. But most importantly, what it is that the :prayer: "Great Wyatt" has "in the know" that makes a good and qualifying candidate for Sheriff of Lexington County.

Still waiting for that Wyatt.. :roll:

[Anonymous]

I guess since you like to play games I will just say that when you answer my question, I will answer yours. I have said that I don't like Jimmy Metts. New blood can be good or it can be bad, depending. Crime is down, I don't think anyone will argue that. The drug task force is a good entity, dont think anyone will argue with that. Gang problems are not that previlent here, but are going to be more of a problem. The budget is high but not outrageous. Here I will add alittle more. The main reason for the budget increase is the jail. Federal guidlines state how prisoners are to be kept. The more prisoners, the more officers needed. The council still has to approve major expendatures. Accreditation actually saves money in the long run for people who can see beyond right now and actually know why agencies strive for it. I just don't see the problems. But again if you answer my question I will fill you in, but I am not a Metts supporter.

[Anonymous]

Wyatt you are wrong. Accreditation is expensive and gets more expensive every year! They have hidden the cost, taken money from other funds, etc to hide its cost.

They spent more money on one Accreditation conference trip in one year than they claim they spent in four years on all of the accreditation!!!!!!!!! now figure in the number of people who were hired to do jobs that have nothing to do with being a cop but sit behind a desk and warm a chair. Figure in their salaries and you have a tremendous expenditure.

this is why the call answering deputies have not been increased and is far below what it should be so that Metts can look good and brag about being accredited but hasnt helped the citizens by putting more uniformed officers on the street.

Accreditation is very expensive with the waste of money and salaries on people who do nothing to help fight crime.

Believe me I know!!!!!

[Spud]

Harrison was never Lt., was he? That would be news to me.

No

[Spud]

Wyatt, I accept that. It's a fair enough question. I'll answer the best I can.

First: He has a commendable resume. He has put in his years of service in Law Enforcement. The thing that I found to be the most important was not just that he has so many years, but that he has many years of service and qualifications in impactful areas of Law Enforcement.

I don't believe that you should ask someone to do work for you or do a job that you can't efficiently handle and comprehend yourself. It shows strong charachter and is a quality that earns respect and keeps morale in a more positive light. When you act like you are above everyone else, make demands and attempt to supervise individuals in a job that you are not qualified to do, but feel the need to dicate over, you become less effective and therefore less efficient in managing. I have found in observing the campaigning that Harrison has done, he has proven to be a stellar individual who acts like he is no better than any of the volunteers he has working with him. In addition, my understanding is that over the years he has managed and treated his colleagues and team members in the same light.

Secondly. Harrison is a business man. He's not an idiot. He can efficiently handle the budget and hopefully with the him in office a reform will take place that will actually reduce the budget in half, if not more. That is a savings in the long run that will eventually make it's way back to us tax payors. The mindset is an important element when overseeing a large budget. Over time, when you are administering over a large budget, some individuals become less efficient with the spending.

They throw away money in areas that are practically useless and fluff, when they could have been allocated in a more productive manner to more needed and beneficial projects. Since Harrison is willing to relinquish the purse strings and allow the control to go back out into some symbol of population, then there will be a more watchful eye over what is happening with our tax dollars and a better attempt made at using them more conservatively and in more productive matters.

Third: With new and younger faces you bring to the table more innovative ideas. Our County has not had any real meaningful ideas in quite a while. With Harrison I have seen him in the school system, with his Charity program, etc. and his mind is constantly turning with new concepts and ideas that if they come to fruition will allow our Community and Law Enforcement to come to understand each other a little better. In addition, it will allow for more educational program opportunities and a more officier friendly community enviornment. Now, before you jump to conclusions. I don't mean we need a community of officiers who play hop scotch with our kids in the streets and bring cookies by to introduce themselves. Quite the opposite. I believe we need to reinforce that our Law Enforcement is here to protect and serve the citizens of Lexington County. By becoming more visible in our communities, having more contacts with our schools and having PTA meetings that include our local law enforcement with updates on gangs and the latest "Need To Know's" in our community. Not just when it happens and the Sheriff is attempting to do damage control. Late breaking news is just that LATE!

Prevention is Key to stopping a lot of the negatives that happen in our Society. I have heard and seen innovative ideas and approaches that work and I have heard Harrison speak of them in public. They are sound and practical ideas that will be very effective. The ideas have been stale for a very long time at LCSD. (By the way, Kudos that you don't work there and are stable and employed elsewhere). However, there are several men and women who are still employed there. It's really interesting. When I am out in a restaraunt or store and I see a LCSD, if I have a moment I try to talk with them to see what they think about the candidates. The most concerning is that these men and women appear to be ready for a change to. If you have no loyalty from the men and women who you employ and you have no knowledge or capability to get out there and work beside them when necessary, how effective can you really be in your job?

I see Harrison as being effective for that very reason. He does have a vast knowledge of his job, other law enforcement jobs including SRO which makes him even more diverse in Law Enforcement because he has been in dispatching and worked all realms and still does.

You see the most interesting thing to all of this is that regardless of what has come this mans way, he has allowed nothing and no task become to menial for Mr. Harrison. Especially when it comes to protecting, serving and working in our community. That is exactly the kind of Sheriff we need. One that is willing to work at serving and protecting us on ALL LEVELS!

Has it not clicked with anyone that Harrison actually wanted to learn what being an SRO was, so that he had a better understanding of what the demands and needs are in that position? Because unless you guys have walked it, you have no clue. The kids are not the only ones who rely heavily on SRO's. School officials, staff and even us parents rely on these men and women to take care of our kids while they are at school and keep them safe.

One last note. I have met Sheriff Lott several times. He doesn't strike me as someone who HAS to employ ANYONE. Sheriff Lott was never OBLIGATED to hire Harrison or anyone else. Does anyone know if Harrison was offered a higher ranking position and turned it down? I know the answer to that question. I think maybe some of you guys might want to check that out instead of making accussations about something you really don't know much about.

I hope that answers your questions Wyatt. :razz:

Have a nice weekend.

Another reason that is voiced by folks who like Metts is their concern about the damage James is doing. They say that they will vote against Jimmy to get rid of Timmy.

[Spud]

Wyatt you are wrong. Accreditation is expensive and gets more expensive every year! They have hidden the cost, taken money from other funds, etc to hide its cost.

They spent more money on one Accreditation conference trip in one year than they claim they spent in four years on all of the accreditation!!!!!!!!! now figure in the number of people who were hired to do jobs that have nothing to do with being a cop but sit behind a desk and warm a chair. Figure in their salaries and you have a tremendous expenditure.

this is why the call answering deputies have not been increased and is far below what it should be so that Metts can look good and brag about being accredited but hasnt helped the citizens by putting more uniformed officers on the street.

[img][
Believe me I know!!!!!

Accreditation is an expensive way to insure that things are done right. If you consider the number of hours sworn staff (officers who could be out fighting crime) spends just preparing for the biweekly meetings, the cost in salaries and benefits for the staff (some of who may be sowrn officers who fight no crime)hired to keep track of the numbers and put it all together for the meetings (which James usually shows up late for), The costs for publishing and copying the stuff for the meetings, and the number of hours actually spent conducting the meetings (which may have anywhere from 15 to 30 people tied up for the major portion of the day), you will find that you could hire a couple of deputies for what is spent doing largely busy work.

[Anonymous]

Ok Wyatt, “I’ll be your Huckleberry”. Why choose Harrison? Listed below you will find what I use to qualify my candidate:

To become a Sheriff, an applicant: must not be less than 21 years of age, with weight proportional to height; have vision correctable to 20-20, with normal color vision; have normal hearing in each ear; be a citizen of the United States and a resident of the state of South Carolina; have a current SC driver’s license; be free from physical, emotional, or mental conditions that might adversely affect job performance; have no criminal record (minor traffic violations excluded); not, by reason of conscience or belief, be opposed to using force when appropriate or necessary to fulfill required duties; pass a civil service examination and be certified by the county’s Civil Service Commission; meet all South Carolina Peace Officer Standards and Training Requirements; and pass a rigid background investigation.

Harrison, clearly meets this criteria. Whereas Sheriff Metts does not! Now Wyatt, that’s just the basics.

Sheriffs have the authority to appoint a Chief Deputy, who’s job is to assists with the office’s duties and acts as chief coordinator. Harrison, has the ability to appoint a caliber Chief Deputy. However, Mett’s appointed Tim James, once again, showing a qualification that he clearly does not have. James was a weighty anchor in this already sinking ship.

Other Functions and Sub-functions that I consider very important:

Law Enforcement encompasses all objectives that pertain to preventing, controlling, and reducing crime; enforcing criminal law and apprehending criminals; monitoring activities of the courts and related agencies having criminal jurisdiction; and ensuring public safety. Harrison once again very qualified to complete this task. They are mandated to engage in the following sub-functions:

-- Maintaining Public Order and Security: Harrison, very capable
-- Enforcing Local Legislation: Harrison, very capable
-- Controlling traffic: Harrison, been there done that
-- Communicating and Reporting Criminal Activity (CJIC), (CIC), (NLETS)
and (NCIC) reporting: Harrison, very capable-- Investigating Crime: Harrison, been there done that
-- Making arrests: Again, Harrison proven statistic
-- Detaining and Booking Offenders: Harrison completed and capable
-- Providing Assistance to the Courts: Harrison completed and capable
-- Incarcerating Offenders: Harrison, once again knowledgeable and
capable of completing this requirment.

-- Administering Internal Operations: Harrison was a supervisor, is a
business owner and knows how to operate efficiently and effectively.

-- Managing the agency: (this would include internal office management activities, corresponding and communicating, meeting, documenting policy and procedures, reporting, litigating, legislating (drafting, lobbying, tracking) publicizing and providing information, managing records, and managing information systems technology. Harrison, has strong management skills, is very computer knowledgeable, has a proven track record of reporting, documenting, administering policy and procedures throughout his career and maintaining records. Again, qualified!
--Managing Finances: Include budgeting (preparing and reviewing a budget package, purchasing (requisition and purchasing supplies and equipment, receipting and invoicing for goods, and authorizing payment for products received); accounting for expenditure, encumbrance, disbursement, and reconciliation of funds within the agency’s budget through a uniform system of accounting and reporting; authorizing travel; contracting with companies or individuals; bidding for products and services; assisting in the audit process; investing; and issuing bonds. Well, well Wyatt.. Here we have a larger issue. You see Sheriff Mett’s has done a very poor job of the above! Harrison is willing to REDUCE the budget that is already OVER INFLATED by Metts. Jail House my foot. Are you his accountant? Harrison is willing to cut out the FLUFF! That would mean that he is willing to scale down the areas that are over staffed therefore reducing the salary overage and making the staff that was hired to do the jobs internally do actually suck it up and do their jobs. Did I happen to mention that’s also why you have ACCOUNTANTS /CPA’s. Sometimes consulting them will empower you not to screw up so much!!! Again, if you REALLY had spoken with Harrison. You would know what his ideas are on cutting this budget down and in turn helping out the citizens of Lexington County by not contributing to raising our taxes like Mett’s has done. Harrison – QUALIFIED
--Managing Human Resources: Activities include recruiting and hiring ELIGIBLE individuals to fill positions within the agency; providing compensation to employees; supervising employees by evaluating performance, promoting, granting leave, disciplining, training and providing continuing education for employees. Once again, Harrison is just as qualified as ole Jimmy to handle this job. Also, have you ever heard of an HR Person? They are pretty knowledgeable about this area too. Sometimes Wyatt, you have to hire people to facilitate over certain areas.

It’s why we retain Attorneys when we need them or pay a doctor for treatment and diagnosis. Believe it or not, we’re not ALL Super Humans able to complete every job under the son sole handedly. However, it does take someone knowledgable about people, who take the time to look into their employment history, etc.. to hire the caliber individuals you need in order to put together a strong and dedicated team. Harrison has this capability.
--Managing properties, facilities, and resources: No, this doesn’t mean managing your own businesses on company time. Nor does it mean using company leased vehicles for personal career enhancing, political objective, nudity bar trips etc.. Did I mention that although Harrison doesn’t own a restaurant, invest in a T&A bar or use leased vehicles to drive to other career paying jobs? Harrison can adequately manage a business, charity and hold down a full-time job and did I mention he’s also running for Sheriff of Lexington County. Oops, I left out that he volunteers to help out kids in our community too, shows up to meetings, walks door to door and meets the public, etc… Geeze, what an ass this candidate is. NOT!!

The next time you ask for answers to a question Wyatt, be certain you can stomach the answers! Now, Pony up, or should I say MULE up Wyatt?

What’s your candidacy qualifications and requirement checks and balance system? Your turn! Please, try to give me a little "MEAT"!

[Anonymous]

Well, another waste of time reading dribble. First, your litany of requirements to be sheriff are not correct. Those are the requirements to be a police officer in South Carolina. I believe that people have been elected sheriff who later became certified. You see there is a one year window there to complete the academy.
Once again you only state that Harrison has all this experience without saying where and when he got it. I mean, from what I understand the guy has never even been on a major crimes task force. I think he was a road deputy and then was in narcotics for his time at LCSD. Now he is in the lofty position of school resource officer. Where did he get all this other experience?
Budget smudget. I said that money did not matter to me. If you think that county council will cut taxes if someone cuts their budget then you are crazy. The only people that will hurt will be the deputies and employees of the department. So it is a non-issue.
Interstingly, you bring up the chief deputy slot. Who will be in that position under Harrison? If it is so important that it is what Metts messed up on then who will fill the position under Harrison? Ask him, I did and no answer.
I have heard, but have no first hand knowledge, that Harrison was not that great of a narc anyway. Sloppy cases, lost evidence, the entire gambit of problems. His entire team was disbanded. Maybe you are one of them. I don't know but I just dont see the great officer you see, or where he got all this experience. Has he ever run a jail? Who will do that? Has he ever investigated any case outside of drugs? If so where? and What?
Get real. Too much fluff again. Go ahead and say I cant handle the answers, but as far as I see there haven't been any yet and obviously none will be coming. Like I have said before, you got one vote, I got one vote. I guess we will be cancelling each other out unless someone can give me answers.

[Anonymous]

Once again Wyatt. Close, but NOT!! You see, in order to be Sheriff, you have to be able to meet the criteria for a Deputy. "Budget, Smudget" Hate it!!! That's part of the job. If you screwed it up this much, 4 more years will make a complete shams of it.

Investigations... Do you read or do you just summize what you will from Harrison's credentials. Clearly it states, Dispatch, Road Deputy, Criminal Investigations, Narcotic and now yes, SRO. Which if you have children, and they end up getting beaten at school, abused, neglected or taken. Be certain to see someone other than the lowley SRO. Because what the hell are they there for anyway right? Once again Wyatt. You have asked questions, received answers and then did what all the other Metts supporters to. Stink up the forum with nothing concrete. You see, you have not answered even the most simple question posed to you. Why NOT vote for Harrison? Why would you VOTE for Metts? Put up or shut up Wyatt!! Once again, your whines are getting old.

[Anonymous]

Folks, let's get over Wyatt. We are not going to change his mind, he is not going to change ours. I for one refuse to get sucked down by his standards. As far as we know he could be one of the good ole boys. Let's move on.

Wyatt been nice. Have a great lfe guy!. ;-)

[Anonymous]

Works for me. He really didn't want answers anyway. Sounded more like fishing. Given real facts and he didn't know what to do other than try to smoke screen more.

See ya Wyatt!!! June 8th

[Anonymous]

Why vote for Metts? Because the fix would be worse than the problem. Harrison has NO EXPERIENCE (period) So many people on here talk about Jake Knotts blowing up his resume when Harrison is guilty also. He stank as a narc, got canned for goodnes knows what reason, tried to sue but didn't have a case, and got thrown a bone across the river. His entire campain is based on lies and speculation. He is vendictive. Plain and simple. He is running because he got fired. If he wins, then so be it. That is why we live in America, but for goodness sake, take a dang stand. Show what you have done and what you plan to do. Unlike Metts, Harrison has no record to run on. Metts can run on his record. Crime is down. Cant argue that. Seems to me like you all want a Sheriff you can go complain to. Well you see, people have been complaing to Metts for years and he takes care of those complaints from his constiuants. That is why he has run unopposed so many times. He HAS kept people in the county happy. Only the blind wont see that. Like I have said many times over, campains run on vote for me because the other guy is worse fail. Only when someone can say vote for me because here is what I will do and here are the problems can a candidate hope to win. That is just life. Right now all I hear is that Metts stinks worse than Harrison. Sad that a campain is run that way. Oh yea, I almost forgot. If Harrison got every vote from every person that has showed up to one of his "events" he still would not pull in 10% of the vote (and I can tell you that he won't get votes from everyone who attended.) Now Reality, that IS REALITY.
And Metts' Fantasy World, dismiss me as a lost cause and Harrison dismisses a majority of the population. I believe it is time for a change, but that Harrison is not the man to do it. Once again, that is reality.

[Anonymous]

Well said Fantasy and Reality.

Wyatt, you sound like a broken record. Nice chatting with you. Be SAFE out there. GOODBYE!!! :D

[Anonymous]

Well now, I don't think Harrison has to get a majority of the overall population to win the REPUBLICAN primary. He needs to get a majority of the REPUBLICAN votes cast on June 8th. What seems to be missing from our discussions is the fact that the REPUBLICAN PARTY has interests that extend beyond the Sheriif's race, but may ironicaly impact upon it. As you will all recall, when Hodges ran against Beasley, many in the Lexington County Republican Party were struggling to help maintain control of the Governor's mansion. Beasley's defeat had consequences within the Lexington Republican Party as well as the state party as a whole. Simply stated, it made a difference that he lost. While many were working to get the party solidly behind Beasley, who do you think wrote a humorous little song and jumped into the race and prompty had a major political meltdown. That's right, our very own smiling pumpkin Sheriff. Little Jimmy dropped the proverbial stinky in the party punch bowl. Maybe you don't remember, but the folks who have tried to maintain and build the party do.

There is a rumor going around that Jimmy and David have decided to forget the past and be friends. Don't believe it. You can bet Beasley's supporters haven't forgotten. I'm sure Jimmy would want you to believe that little fable, but there is just nothing to it. Don't believe me? Just look for any sign from Beasley that he and Jimmy are buddies. It ain't there.

Golly, it looks like Beasley has got a little lead in the polls. Let's see, if Beasley's folks are none too fond of Jimmy, and Beasley is in the lead and those who vote for Beasley are probably not going to vote for Jimmy. Well, you can see where this is leading.

As Bob Dylan said, "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing." There seems to be a shift in the wind.

[Anonymous]

And you know that Stanford's and his people don't like Metts either. Not many friends in the Republician party. Guess he'll have to change parties. :twisted:

[Anonymous]

I can understand why some of the other republicans don't like him. How would you like it if he endorsed YOUR competition?

[Anonymous]

The Crotch Doctor plays with himself well, but not with others.

[Anonymous]

I agree with you but it is not enough to just talk about it on this website. It is time for a change and we need to get behind these candidates that are willing to step up to the plate against these Good Old Boys and make a change. Volunteer, contribute or just do something to get the word out!

Change is the word for June 8th! :axe:

[Anonymous]

Lets get one thing straight here, you people keep harping on accreditation when it is clear that you do not understand the reason beind it. You see cops get sued all the time, it goes with the work. Being accredited is a huge part of protection and gives the department all types of benifits in the civil area, from lower insurance rates to several other aspects. Bottom line, it is expensive, but there is a reason for it. I guess using your analogy that Robert Steward should be fired because SLED is accredited and every other county Sheriff's department that is accredited is crazy, and that the person in charge of our state prison system is an idiot for obtaining accreditation. Go blow that smoke somewhere else to someone that does not know the difference.
I am still waiting on someone to explain to me where all of Harrison's experience came from? Being in charge of 1100 kids is important but it is a cush job. The toughest thinkg that has to be dealt with is a kid with a joint or breaking up a playground brawl. Get real. I don't think that any major crimes occur at school that even requires any great knowledge in investigation or crime solving. Most of the time the school already has the information needed and the cop just turns it over to someone else. So, where is the experience? Heck, I dont even think that the drug trade in Lexington county went down when he was supposedly in charge of narcotics. You folks need to get real.

[Anonymous]

Wyatt,
If you think being at a school is so easy, you are sadly mistaken. Maybe you should check out the Family Court one day when these kids are going in front of the judges. I promise you it is for a lot more than joints and fighting. The hearings are open to the public and you could learn a thing or two.

[Anonymous]

Wyatt said: "Being accredited is a huge part of protection and gives the department all types of benifits in the civil area, from lower insurance rates to several other aspects. "


Wyatt, your ignorance (and your blind support of Metts) is showing!!!

First of all the "Accreditation" offers absolutely NO protection in a civil or criminal suit. Yes, the Accreditation Council would love for you to believe that, as they make A LOT OF MONEY when an agency pays them the fees. They started a propaganda pitch claiming that having their standard would provide you protection and give the appearance of a good agency, but guess what!? They are trying to make money!!! They started this ego thing and tried making chiefs and sheriff's feel that if they are not accredited they were second class and had to keep up with the Jones (the other agencies). Too many fell for the ploy.

If Accreditation offers so much protection ask this one question, when an agency is sued, lets say for a use of force issue, who is their "expert" who is coming to testify for you??? The answer is NO ONE!! Yet, when you have your defensive tactics instructors certified by say PPCT or Monadnock, etc. they will send a expert to your defense. You are talking a few hundred dollars to get an instructor certified versus huge $$$ for Accreditation. Gee kind of a big difference here!!

Many agencies are NOT seeking Accreditation as it is a scam. Others are meeting the "standards" but saving their money and not applying for Accreditation.

Of course the cost to an agencies to achieve Accreditation varies tremendously. Some agencies are in such a good state that they already have policies and procedures in place to achieve this mystical Accreditation with little expense.

In the case of the Lexington sheriff's department tons of people were hired and a whole new policy/procedure manual written and money spent by the truck loads to get this "Accreditation". Of course it is all for naught considering Jimmy and Timmy do not abide by the policy/procedures that they wrote for Accreditation so there goes their beloved "standard" they were going to hang their hat on in a lawsuit! (By the way Timmy, hurry up and decide on those promotional tests, you know don't like any of the candidates and are trying to find a way to pick who you want!).

Wyatt, I am thinking you may be Metts campaign manager, you sound a lot like him.

[Anonymous]

I think everyone is missing Wyatt's point. He is trying to initiate a new campaign strategy for Metts. They wanted to discredit Harrison over an alledged affair and that didn't work. Then they wanted to say that Harrison didn't have any experience to handle the job but then someone remembered that Harrison will bring more experience to the Office than Metts did when he was first elected. Hmmmmm, that didn't work! Okay, let's try he was fired. No, that Sheriff in Richland County was fired before he got elected; so that's not going to work! OH, I got it now, Harrison doesn't deserve to be Sheriff because his campaign is just a personal vendetta!

Sad, so very, very sad!

[Anonymous]

Others you are the county's idiot. Batesburg-Leesville is not the haven of democrats, the western area of the county just doesnt support the Sheriff. Metts hasnt carried B-L, Fairview, Gilbert, Summit and the rest for nearly 20 years.

[Anonymous]

Betcha that Crotch Grabbing thingy didn't help matters now did it?